Treated Like Animals
Alick Simmons, former deputy chief veterinary officer for the United Kingdom, acknowledges that he has “actively facilitated exploitative interactions with animals.” But so have the rest of us, he writes in his intriguing book, Treated Like Animals: Improving the Lives of the Creatures We Own, Eat and Use. Simmons does not limit “exploitative interactions” to only mean eating meat or wearing leather. By applying a broad definition of “exploit” (“to make full use of and derive benefit from”), he contends that we are also complicit in animal exploitation by managing wildlife, destroying “pests,” and even keeping cats and dogs as pets (e.g., through selective breeding and castration).
Nevertheless, Simmons does not promote ending all animal exploitation. Rather, he encourages us to become better informed about the myriad ways societies and economies depend on animals—and to be more accountable for our choices. Humans, as moral beings, have a responsibility to protect the sentient animals we exploit, yet we often apply arbitrary and contradictory distinctions between species—and even within the same species.
The author acknowledges his own inconsistencies—he eats meat (albeit less now), goes fishing, and supports wildlife interventions to protect endangered species. He advocates a “practical” and “utilitarian” middle ground; animal research is justified, he feels, when it advances important medical knowledge and no alternative exists, but it must be carefully regulated to minimize suffering. With respect to food, Simmons clearly has an insider’s perspective (he used to inspect American slaughter plants on behalf of the United Kingdom), and he tries not to alienate readers by promoting a specific lifestyle. At various points, he lumps animal rights extremists with industry propagandists.
Simmons largely limits his discussion of protecting animals, especially in slaughterhouses and in research labs, to UK laws, even though he acknowledges that the United States and other countries have weaker regulations. Notwithstanding this narrow focus, his overall message is universal: that we, as a society, must determine (based on evidence) when the benefits of animal exploitation outweigh the harms.
Program Terms: Animals in Laboratories, Farmed Animals
AWI Quarterly Terms: Review
Related News
New Analysis: Animal Welfare Act Enforcement Deteriorates Following SCOTUS Ruling
In Program: Animals in LaboratoriesThe US Department of Agriculture, long known for its lackluster enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), appears in recent years to have drifted even...
Titus Reintroduces Humane Transport of Farmed Animals Act as New AWI Report Reveals Feeble Enforcement of Welfare Violations
In Program: Farmed AnimalsToday, US Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) reintroduced the Humane Transport of Farmed Animals Act to improve conditions for livestock transported across the United States. The bill would...
AWI Statement on Trump Administration’s Plan to Reduce Animal Experimentation Amid Attack on Science
In Program: Animals in LaboratoriesThe Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) applauds recent announcements by the National Institutes of Health and the US Food and Drug Administration about their plans to reduce the use of...
New Poll: Consumers Overwhelmingly Support Meaningful Standards for “Humanely Raised” Food Label
In Program: Farmed AnimalsEighty-eight percent of American consumers believe that claims such as “humanely raised” or “sustainably farmed” on meat and poultry products should be based on meaningful,...