VA Told to Reduce Reliance on Dogs in Research
A committee of experts—convened at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review whether it is “necessary” for the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to continue using dogs in biomedical research to fulfill its mission—has published its final report. After nearly two years of deliberation, the committee of researchers, physicians, veterinarians, lawyers, and bioethicists concluded that the use of dogs is “scientifically necessary for only a few areas of current [VA] biomedical research.” In addition to listing the types of research for which laboratory dogs should no longer be used (for example, diabetes, narcolepsy, or primary pharmacological studies), the report encouraged a shift toward clinical trials with companion dogs who naturally develop some of the same diseases as humans, adding that these dogs can also benefit from the research in which they participate.
The report also pointed out several deficiencies regarding the animal component of the VA’s research protocols, such as inadequate justification for the relevance of the proposed study to veterans’ health, why dogs were needed, and how investigators arrived at the number of dogs they were requesting. Certain research protocols also lacked input from key veterinary professionals to safeguard the welfare of research dogs, for example in studies where individual dogs underwent multiple surgeries. (The Animal Welfare Act discourages subjecting animals to more than one major operative experiment unless certain specific requirements are met.)
Finally, while acknowledging that current federal regulations “provide a foundation for the assessment of well-being,” the committee encouraged the VA to look toward international regulations and guidelines, which are based on more recent literature and higher standards of care. The report offers a number of recommendations for reducing the VA’s use of laboratory dogs and improving their welfare. It recommended funding independent literature searches that emphasize replacement of dogs, not just a reduction in numbers.
Program Terms: Animals in Laboratories, Companion Animals
AWI Quarterly Terms: Quick Read
Related News
New Analysis: Animal Welfare Act Enforcement Deteriorates Following SCOTUS Ruling
In Program: Animals in LaboratoriesThe US Department of Agriculture, long known for its lackluster enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), appears in recent years to have drifted even...
AWI Awards Safe Havens for Pets Grant to Support Unhoused People and Pets in DC
In Program: Companion AnimalsThis Domestic Violence Awareness Month, the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) is pleased to announce a $15,000 grant to the Humane Rescue Alliance (HRA) to support...
Refuge from Cruel Trapping Act Reintroduced to Protect Wildlife and Pets on Public Lands
In Program: Companion Animals, Terrestrial WildlifeThe Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) endorses the Refuge from Cruel Trapping Act, reintroduced today in the US House of Representatives by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)....
AWI Statement on Trump Administration’s Plan to Reduce Animal Experimentation Amid Attack on Science
In Program: Animals in LaboratoriesThe Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) applauds recent announcements by the National Institutes of Health and the US Food and Drug Administration about their plans to reduce the use of...